Message179856
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Ben.Darnell, brett.cannon, danielsh, eric.araujo, flox, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date | 2013-01-13.10:19:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1358072218.3343.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1358072189.06.0.44115031601.issue14208@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I'm not seeing a good justification for doing anything more, though: > > - needing to access this information is an exceedingly niche use case > - I don't see any way for raw_argv to be useful in a cross-implementation manner. I expect it to be useful in the "launch (almost) the same command in the same way" situation. Not that it happens often :-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-01-13 10:19:20 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, Arfrever, flox, Ben.Darnell, danielsh |
| 2013-01-13 10:19:20 | pitrou | link | issue14208 messages |
| 2013-01-13 10:19:19 | pitrou | create | |