Message180255
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, kynan, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv |
| Date | 2013-01-19.19:28:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1358623525.3619.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1358606971.41.0.253488148199.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I think we're going to have to separate out two counts in the metrics > - the total number of tests (the current counts), and the total number > of subtests (the executed subtest blocks). This is a reasonable proposal. On the other hand, it was already the case that a single test could count for several failures (for example, an exception in the test method and another in tearDown). Therefore, I think it is independent from the subtest proposal and could be tackled separately (which would also help keep this issue focussed :-)). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-01-19 19:28:05 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, kynan, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
| 2013-01-19 19:28:05 | pitrou | link | issue16997 messages |
| 2013-01-19 19:28:03 | pitrou | create | |