Message180899
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv |
| Date | 2013-01-29.10:54:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1359456842.18.0.31006974491.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I like the idea of the subTest API being something like:
def subTest(self, _id, *, **params):
However, I'd still factor that in to the reported test ID, not into the exception message. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-01-29 10:54:02 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
| 2013-01-29 10:54:02 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1359456842.18.0.31006974491.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-01-29 10:54:02 | ncoghlan | link | issue16997 messages |
| 2013-01-29 10:54:01 | ncoghlan | create | |