Message180981
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pitrou |
| Date | 2013-01-30.18:13:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1359569616.3.0.503858858082.issue17015@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I am a little concerned that this relies on Python 3 only features of > inspect, and *in fact* relies on bug fixes in Python 3.4 to work. The bug fix has landed in 3.3 as well ;-) (see 49fd1c8aeca5) I guess a backport of inspect.signature() would allow it to work on previous Pythons, too. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-01-30 18:13:36 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, michael.foord |
| 2013-01-30 18:13:36 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1359569616.3.0.503858858082.issue17015@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-01-30 18:13:36 | pitrou | link | issue17015 messages |
| 2013-01-30 18:13:36 | pitrou | create | |