Message 181580 - Python tracker

Message181580

Author	neologix
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, inc0, neologix, pitrou
Date	2013-02-07.07:31:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAH_1eM2SQeH24duUb2t9g7HqhAyEeZ+u=Cy0sbTpnFfNh6gTRw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1360181877.57.0.455929999026.issue16038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Well, that is not from RFC (or I hadn't find it):) however I'd lie if I'd call myself an expert, should I change limit to 4096 then? It's probably not in the RFC: this just shows that the limit chosen should be enough.

Content

> Well, that is not from RFC (or I hadn't find it):) however I'd lie if I'd call myself an expert, should I change limit to 4096 then?

It's probably not in the RFC: this just shows that the limit chosen
should be enough.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-02-07 07:31:15	neologix	set	recipients: + neologix, georg.brandl, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, inc0
2013-02-07 07:31:15	neologix	link	issue16038 messages
2013-02-07 07:31:15	neologix	create