Message181875
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Julian, Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, bfroehle, borja.ruiz, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, fperez, hpk, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, santoso.wijaya, serhiy.storchaka, spiv |
| Date | 2013-02-11.07:06:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1360566216.3442.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1360553854.64.0.243689160097.issue16997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> It seems like the last patch (subtests5.patch) dropped the parameter > data from the failure output as described in the docs. For example, > the example in the docs yields the following: > > FAIL: test_even (__main__.NumbersTest) Weird, since there are unit tests for that. I'll take a look. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-02-11 07:06:45 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, hpk, flox, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
| 2013-02-11 07:06:45 | pitrou | link | issue16997 messages |
| 2013-02-11 07:06:45 | pitrou | create | |