Message183592
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alex, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2013-03-06.14:14:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <477825976.15103683.1362579240810.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to | <1362573437.05.0.906329883469.issue17338@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> By the way CPython's list type does more than log(N) resize ops: Obviously it's an asymptotic complexity, not a hard number. > I understand the proposal as a power user tool. Most people don't > need a pneumatic hammer, an ordinary hammer suffices. But in some > cases you need a tool with more power. "CPython doesn't gain much > from the new API, let's not add it to Python" isn't nice to other > implementations that may benefit from it. I'd still like to see concrete use cases, not micro-benchmarks. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-03-06 14:14:07 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, scoder, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, alex, neologix, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-03-06 14:14:07 | pitrou | link | issue17338 messages |
| 2013-03-06 14:14:07 | pitrou | create | |