Message183617
| Author | neologix |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Trundle, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, loewis, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, terry.reedy, tim.golden, torsten |
| Date | 2013-03-06.21:57:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAH_1eM0JjSvc0=B1APkOF5sY4510QaEh9SJvk+R+gZm7EjUSsw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <5137A2EA.9030304@timgolden.me.uk> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> IIRC Nick Coghlan had put a bit of work into this a few months ago as an > external module with a view to seeing if it got traction before putting > anything into the stdlib. Might be worth pinging him, or looking to see > what he'd done. Can't remember the keywords to search for, I'm afraid. > Something like "directory walker" Nick's walkdir is "just" an improved walk - with a lot of added functionality, like filtering etc. But it's still based on os.walk(), which in turn uses listdir(), since it's currently the only way to list the content of a directory. So in short, it won't help for this issue. To limit the memory usage, on would have to have to use an iterator based on readdir(). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-03-06 21:57:45 | neologix | set | recipients: + neologix, loewis, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, eric.araujo, Trundle, brian.curtin, torsten, nvetoshkin, socketpair, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-03-06 21:57:45 | neologix | link | issue11406 messages |
| 2013-03-06 21:57:45 | neologix | create | |