Message183678
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, christian.heimes, pitrou, r.david.murray, tim.peters |
| Date | 2013-03-07.16:29:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1362673789.12.0.617649359124.issue17379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yeah, but in this case I think Antoine is right. This kind of "argument" is the kind of argument that is used to shut down discussion, in form whether or not in substance. Which is too bad, because it is nicely clever. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-03-07 16:29:49 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, tim.peters, barry, pitrou, christian.heimes |
| 2013-03-07 16:29:49 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1362673789.12.0.617649359124.issue17379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-03-07 16:29:49 | r.david.murray | link | issue17379 messages |
| 2013-03-07 16:29:48 | r.david.murray | create | |