Message185593
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, bgailer, docs@python, eric.araujo, eric.snow, georg.brandl, nedbat, r.david.murray, techtonik, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2013-03-30.21:53:50 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1364680431.32.0.403935787504.issue17546@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The problem with using 'nonlocal' is that it would naturally be read as 'those names referenced in a nonlocal statement', which I don't think is the case. Maybe 'non-local', to differentiate it from the keyword? I'm attaching a patch incorporating my understanding of the suggestions made so far. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-03-30 21:53:51 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, techtonik, nedbat, bgailer, eric.araujo, docs@python, eric.snow |
| 2013-03-30 21:53:51 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1364680431.32.0.403935787504.issue17546@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-03-30 21:53:51 | r.david.murray | link | issue17546 messages |
| 2013-03-30 21:53:51 | r.david.murray | create | |