Message185615
| Author | techtonik |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, bgailer, docs@python, eric.araujo, eric.snow, georg.brandl, nedbat, r.david.murray, techtonik, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2013-03-31.05:36:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAPkN8x+iHNspSZgSv4b_tYtM1easB2pYeumx6RLaZ3h_3--RCw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1364706218.66.0.637300961982.issue17546@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> ... cannot be relied upon to either happen or not happen... IMHO this phrase is from Advanced English course. > The original included the caution against modifying it, and I think it is valid because of the inconsistent behavior. > Perhaps it could be weakened to "it is not a good idea to modify"? Ambiguity already adds fear and uncertainty. Just explaining the consequences would be good style for the technical doc. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-03-31 05:36:25 | techtonik | set | recipients: + techtonik, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, nedbat, bgailer, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, docs@python, eric.snow |
| 2013-03-31 05:36:25 | techtonik | link | issue17546 messages |
| 2013-03-31 05:36:24 | techtonik | create | |