Message186017
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | lemburg, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-04-04.09:21:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwY6ayw9JW3dEceXmgMsUaW95TTtoXrgSQN4mt1xyBwXoA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <515D4349.4020904@egenix.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
By the way, my initial concern was to merge unicode_compare_eq() and unicode_eq() functions. unicode_compare_eq() only uses memcmp(), whereas unicode_eq() checks if the first byte is different before calling memcmp(). So the question is to decide which one is faster ;-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-04-04 09:21:43 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, lemburg, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-04-04 09:21:43 | vstinner | link | issue17628 messages |
| 2013-04-04 09:21:43 | vstinner | create | |