Message186308
| Author | asvetlov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, atykhonov, georg.brandl, pitrou |
| Date | 2013-04-08.15:27:38 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1365434858.57.0.632702099227.issue17650@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Sorry for reopening. Do you really sure that ENOTCONN and EINVAL doesn't worth to have separate sublasses? The same question about Not Supported family. I don't force to make new exception classes, just like to figure out the status quo. If we decide to keep in stone our exceptions hierarchy for OSError's — that's ok. If list is open — let's discuss |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-04-08 15:27:38 | asvetlov | set | recipients: + asvetlov, georg.brandl, pitrou, atykhonov |
| 2013-04-08 15:27:38 | asvetlov | set | messageid: <1365434858.57.0.632702099227.issue17650@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-04-08 15:27:38 | asvetlov | link | issue17650 messages |
| 2013-04-08 15:27:38 | asvetlov | create | |