Message187562
| Author | Tomoki.Imai |
|---|---|
| Recipients | JayKrish, Todd.Rovito, Tomoki.Imai, ezio.melotti, francismb, ncoghlan, ned.deily, r.david.murray, roger.serwy, terry.reedy, tshepang |
| Date | 2013-04-22.13:30:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1366637424.58.0.865835276419.issue15392@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Oh, no support for Python2? I think, it is too old, but still needs bug-fix supports. IDLE for Python2 is really buggy. For example, unicode problems in my environment. http://bugs.python.org/issue17348 It might be GUI related problem. By the way, your proposal seemed good to me. My proposal is almost same. Using unittest module, make directory such as idlelib/test and write unittest there. But I want to include Python2 and GUI support. (So, there are unittset.mock problem) Of cource, it is very import to concentrate on one thing (i.e Python3). I cannot deside whether to drop Python2 support now. I considered PEP 434 premit me writing unittest for Python2. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0434/ How do you think? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-04-22 13:30:24 | Tomoki.Imai | set | recipients: + Tomoki.Imai, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, ned.deily, ezio.melotti, roger.serwy, r.david.murray, Todd.Rovito, tshepang, francismb, JayKrish |
| 2013-04-22 13:30:24 | Tomoki.Imai | set | messageid: <1366637424.58.0.865835276419.issue15392@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-04-22 13:30:24 | Tomoki.Imai | link | issue15392 messages |
| 2013-04-22 13:30:24 | Tomoki.Imai | create | |