Message188425
| Author | benhoyt |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Trundle, abacabadabacaba, benhoyt, brian.curtin, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, loewis, ncoghlan, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, terry.reedy, tim.golden, torsten, twouters, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-05-05.03:50:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1367725842.95.0.39899041935.issue11406@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
That's right: if we have a separate scandir() that returns (name, stat) tuples, then a plain iterdir() is pretty much unnecessary -- callers just ignore the second stat value if they don't care about it. I'd slightly prefer the name iterdir_stat(), as that almost makes the (name, stat) return values explicit in the name. But that's kind of bikeshedding -- scandir() works too. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-05-05 03:50:43 | benhoyt | set | recipients: + benhoyt, loewis, twouters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, tim.golden, eric.araujo, Trundle, brian.curtin, torsten, nvetoshkin, neologix, abacabadabacaba, socketpair, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-05-05 03:50:42 | benhoyt | set | messageid: <1367725842.95.0.39899041935.issue11406@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-05-05 03:50:42 | benhoyt | link | issue11406 messages |
| 2013-05-05 03:50:42 | benhoyt | create | |