Message188520
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Devin Jeanpierre, mark.dickinson, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-05-06.12:27:12 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1367843232.6.0.773252766013.issue17884@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> According to what you wrote above, uint32_t can always be used on any > platform. The issue is in *detecting* whether uint32_t exists or not. In cases (1) and (3), that can be done in the preprocessor with an "#ifdef uint32_t". In case (2), it can't: the check fails, because uint32_t isn't a preprocessor define---it's a typedef. *That's* why we need the HAVE_UINT32_T check. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-05-06 12:27:12 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, vstinner, Devin Jeanpierre, skrah |
| 2013-05-06 12:27:12 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1367843232.6.0.773252766013.issue17884@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-05-06 12:27:12 | mark.dickinson | link | issue17884 messages |
| 2013-05-06 12:27:12 | mark.dickinson | create | |