Message188845
| Author | zach.ware |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Todd.Rovito, amaury.forgeotdarc, ezio.melotti, loewis, python-dev, roger.serwy, terry.reedy, trent, zach.ware |
| Date | 2013-05-10.16:00:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1368201643.64.0.626678372455.issue17883@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks for your response, Martin. Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Zach: Temporarily committing changes to test specific buildbot issues > is fine I suppose it would also be beneficial to get some output from the other bots which are *not* failing, to have something to compare with. In that case, here's a (very) temporary patch we can try for a round of builds. > asking the slave operator for direct access to the machine > may also work. Trent, what's your policy on letting non-committers play around in your machines? :) Alternately, do you know of anything about that machine that could be causing the failures? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | set | recipients: + zach.ware, loewis, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, trent, ezio.melotti, roger.serwy, Todd.Rovito, python-dev |
| 2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | set | messageid: <1368201643.64.0.626678372455.issue17883@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | link | issue17883 messages |
| 2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | create | |