Message189120
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | kristjan.jonsson, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-05-13.10:26:31 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <776350391.35651192.1368440785246.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to | <1368440483.31.0.308483973083.issue17936@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The second one is when the class is being deleted, for housekeeping > of the weakrefs. > I worry that your alternative will cause us to walk the entire list > in the second case because it will be called when the weakref has > been cleared, so it will never find itself in the list, only None. I don't think that matters much. In both cases the expected complexity is O(n). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-05-13 10:26:31 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner |
| 2013-05-13 10:26:31 | pitrou | link | issue17936 messages |
| 2013-05-13 10:26:31 | pitrou | create | |