Message 189824 - Python tracker

Message189824

Author	neologix
Recipients	brian.curtin, loewis, neologix, pitrou, tim.golden
Date	2013-05-22.17:03:57
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAH_1eM0L=TRjvbxsffro0Y7J8DdzEQtqzQeAKbWwK6vQEy3UhQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1369153468.24.0.776915762136.issue13483@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I can't speak for Antoine, but I guess that the result of pybench would be enough to make sure it doesn't introduce any regression (which would be really suprising). As for the memory savings, the benchmark you posted earlier is conclusive enough IMO (especially since the it can be difficult to come up with a scheme leading to heap fragmentation).

Content

I can't speak for Antoine, but I guess that the result of pybench
would be enough to make sure it doesn't introduce any regression
(which would be *really* suprising).
As for the memory savings, the benchmark you posted earlier is
conclusive enough IMO (especially since the it can be difficult to
come up with a scheme leading to heap fragmentation).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-05-22 17:03:57	neologix	set	recipients: + neologix, loewis, pitrou, tim.golden, brian.curtin
2013-05-22 17:03:57	neologix	link	issue13483 messages
2013-05-22 17:03:57	neologix	create