Message190897
| Author | amaury.forgeotdarc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, cvs-src, meador.inge |
| Date | 2013-06-10.10:13:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1370859205.85.0.639598224585.issue18178@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Said simpler: dlmalloc.c code is indeed compiled twice: - once as part of closures.c, which #include "dlmalloc.c"; this is done carefully (with 'static' and 'USE_DL_PREFIX') to not clash with standard malloc functions. - once as a separate target; without USE_DL_PREFIX it will define functions named malloc() and free()... The second one is not necessary, of course. The patch looks good to me. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-06-10 10:13:25 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge, cvs-src |
| 2013-06-10 10:13:25 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | messageid: <1370859205.85.0.639598224585.issue18178@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-06-10 10:13:25 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue18178 messages |
| 2013-06-10 10:13:25 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |