Message191029
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, gregory.p.smith, jlaurila, jszakmeister, kristjan.jonsson, ncoghlan, neilo, pitrou, pjmcnerney, rhettinger, tlesher, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-06-12.14:48:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1371048498.67.0.625451613952.issue3329@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Benchmark of py_setallocators-3.patch: - benchmarks suite (-b 2n3): some tests are 1.04x faster, some tests are 1.04 slower, significant is between 115 and -191. I don't understand these output, but I guess that the overhead cannot be seen with such test. - pybench: "+0.1%" (diff between -4.9% and +5.6%) If I understood correctly, the overhead is really really low (near zero). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-06-12 14:48:18 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, barry, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, jszakmeister, tlesher, jlaurila, neilo, pjmcnerney |
| 2013-06-12 14:48:18 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1371048498.67.0.625451613952.issue3329@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-06-12 14:48:18 | vstinner | link | issue3329 messages |
| 2013-06-12 14:48:18 | vstinner | create | |