Message193165
| Author | aliles |
|---|---|
| Recipients | aliles, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, jcea, meador.inge, ncoghlan, rhettinger |
| Date | 2013-07-16.12:49:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1373978965.24.0.313195413339.issue13266@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
My +1 is for the callback based approach. The brevity of the search loop for finding the innermost function is (in my opinion at least) non-obvious, relying on for loops not having their own scope as it does.
If a generator based API was adopted instead, I propose a convenience function (unwrap_all?) to help developers avoid writing code like:
inner = None
for inner in functools.unwrap(outer):
pass
if inner is None:
inner = outer
Which combines a misunderstanding of the API with for loop scope shortcut. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-07-16 12:49:25 | aliles | set | recipients: + aliles, rhettinger, jcea, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, flox, meador.inge, daniel.urban |
| 2013-07-16 12:49:25 | aliles | set | messageid: <1373978965.24.0.313195413339.issue13266@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-07-16 12:49:25 | aliles | link | issue13266 messages |
| 2013-07-16 12:49:24 | aliles | create | |