Message194076
| Author | sbt |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, christian.heimes, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, python-dev, sbt |
| Date | 2013-08-01.14:14:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <51FA6D57.8070101@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1375362735.69.0.489638925149.issue18214@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes, I agree the patch is ok. It would be would be much simpler to keep track of the module dicts if they were weakrefable. Alternatively, at shutdown a weakrefable object with a reference to the module dict could be inserted in to each module dict. We could then use those to find orphaned module dicts. But I doubt it is worth the extra effort. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-08-01 14:14:55 | sbt | set | recipients: + sbt, gregory.p.smith, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, christian.heimes, Arfrever, python-dev |
| 2013-08-01 14:14:55 | sbt | link | issue18214 messages |
| 2013-08-01 14:14:55 | sbt | create | |