Message194684
| Author | eli.bendersky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Robin.Schreiber, asvetlov, effbot, eli.bendersky, pitrou |
| Date | 2013-08-08.15:16:39 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAF-Rda_5KaBqTjGp40ipYaDSRU=OeerCiY67mkZrVz7z6_XcEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <296734553.50663270.1375971265469.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > > Would you mind removing it from the patch, due to the case described > > above? > > ISTM that in real scenarios the sys.modules cache kicks in anyway. It > > should not be really bypassed for any given sub-interpreter in sane > > code. > > Yeah, I think you're right. I'll submit an updated patch or, if it's > the only issue with it, perhaps you can simply remove the 3 offending > lines? > Sure, I'll do that. Thanks. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-08-08 15:16:39 | eli.bendersky | set | recipients: + eli.bendersky, effbot, pitrou, Arfrever, asvetlov, Robin.Schreiber |
| 2013-08-08 15:16:39 | eli.bendersky | link | issue15651 messages |
| 2013-08-08 15:16:39 | eli.bendersky | create | |