Message194785
| Author | arigo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, arigo, eli.bendersky, ezio.melotti, larry, mrabarnett, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters |
| Date | 2013-08-10.07:22:39 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1376119359.66.0.702206873011.issue18647@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Just a side note for 2.7: could I recommend people to be really extra, extra careful when changing what kind of regexps are accepted and what kind of regexps are outright rejected? I believe the risk of making long-existing and working 2.7 programs suddenly crash on the next 2.7 micro version should *by far* outweight the theoretical advantage of crashing early on sufficiently bogus regexps. (Fwiw, I believe the same would apply on 3.x too, where rejecting previously-accepted regexps should only be done in a minor version upgrade.) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-08-10 07:22:39 | arigo | set | recipients: + arigo, tim.peters, pitrou, larry, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, Arfrever, eli.bendersky, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-08-10 07:22:39 | arigo | set | messageid: <1376119359.66.0.702206873011.issue18647@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-08-10 07:22:39 | arigo | link | issue18647 messages |
| 2013-08-10 07:22:39 | arigo | create | |