Message 195797 - Python tracker

Message195797

Author	sbt
Recipients	barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, vstinner
Date	2013-08-21.15:27:33
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<5214DC5D.6020002@gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<CAH_1eM1bmgDkyXVLgd7-Q+F57JCMVMj=LVHdeJO9AWHuXkWJSQ@mail.gmail.com>

Content
On 21/08/2013 3:46pm, Charles-François Natali wrote: > Another, probably cleaner way would be to finally add the atfork() > module (issue #16500), and register this reseed hook (which could then > be implemented in ssl.py). Wouldn't that still suffer from the double-fork() issue?

Content

On 21/08/2013 3:46pm, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Another, probably cleaner way would be to finally add the atfork()
> module (issue #16500), and register this reseed hook (which could then
> be implemented in ssl.py).

Wouldn't that still suffer from the double-fork() issue?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-08-21 15:27:33	sbt	set	recipients: + sbt, barry, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, neologix, python-dev
2013-08-21 15:27:33	sbt	link	issue18747 messages
2013-08-21 15:27:33	sbt	create