Message195824
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alex, barry, docs@python, eric.snow, ethan.furman, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-08-21.21:32:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CADiSq7dHVRrLSJT_LRhhksHgG8W9dJbKvRn9BNchzashHnGkMQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1377064054.88.0.645596281376.issue17576@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On 21 Aug 2013 15:47, "Mark Dickinson" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > > Mark Dickinson added the comment: > > > Shouldn't it be PendingDeprecationWarning? > > Hmm. Possibly. I'm not sure what the policy is any more regarding DeprecationWarning versus PendingDeprecationWarning. Nick? Not sure if this is written down anywhere, but I use PendingDeprecationWarning for "definitely still around next release, may not have a set date for removal" and DeprecationWarning for "may be removed next release". |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-08-21 21:32:15 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, barry, mark.dickinson, vstinner, alex, docs@python, ethan.furman, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-08-21 21:32:15 | ncoghlan | link | issue17576 messages |
| 2013-08-21 21:32:15 | ncoghlan | create | |