Message196383
| Author | neologix |
|---|---|
| Recipients | David.Edelsohn, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, sbt |
| Date | 2013-08-28.13:54:38 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAH_1eM0A4KRgm5ppEA3H8qD=Kr_8adbUQVn6r+zMA=PZ2ehseg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1377694709.8.0.956723027646.issue18786@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Thanks! You're welcome :) BTW, I don't know if that would fulfill the goal of your test here, but when I want to check for EINTR handling, I just use alarm (see attached patch). The only downside is that the minimum delay is 1 second. |
|
| Files | |
|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded |
| eintr_alarm.diff | neologix, 2013-08-28.13:54:37 |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-08-28 13:54:38 | neologix | set | recipients: + neologix, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, David.Edelsohn |
| 2013-08-28 13:54:38 | neologix | link | issue18786 messages |
| 2013-08-28 13:54:38 | neologix | create | |