Message 196776 - Python tracker

Message196776

Author	sYnfo
Recipients	Arfrever, abn, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dstufft, georg.brandl, neologix, python-dev, sYnfo, vstinner
Date	2013-09-02.09:47:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1378115236.01.0.742362989416.issue18709@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Doing 'valgrind --suppressions=valgrind-python.supp ./python Lib/tests/regrtest.py test_ssl.py' I'm getting ==11944== LEAK SUMMARY: ==11944== definitely lost: 32 bytes in 1 blocks ==11944== indirectly lost: 392 bytes in 16 blocks ==11944== possibly lost: 27,008 bytes in 58 blocks ==11944== still reachable: 4,267,092 bytes in 4,124 blocks ==11944== suppressed: 32 bytes in 1 blocks and as far as I can tell the leak is introduced by this patch, I can't seem to figure out what could be causing it though.

Content

Doing 'valgrind --suppressions=valgrind-python.supp ./python Lib/tests/regrtest.py test_ssl.py' I'm getting

==11944== LEAK SUMMARY:
==11944==    definitely lost: 32 bytes in 1 blocks
==11944==    indirectly lost: 392 bytes in 16 blocks
==11944==      possibly lost: 27,008 bytes in 58 blocks
==11944==    still reachable: 4,267,092 bytes in 4,124 blocks
==11944==         suppressed: 32 bytes in 1 blocks

and as far as I can tell the leak is introduced by this patch, I can't seem to figure out what could be causing it though.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-09-02 09:47:16	sYnfo	set	recipients: + sYnfo, barry, georg.brandl, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, neologix, python-dev, dstufft, abn
2013-09-02 09:47:16	sYnfo	set	messageid: <1378115236.01.0.742362989416.issue18709@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-09-02 09:47:15	sYnfo	link	issue18709 messages
2013-09-02 09:47:15	sYnfo	create