Message196798
| Author | lemburg |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, kennyluck, lemburg, loewis, serhiy.storchaka, tchrist, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-09-02.18:03:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <5224D2E5.2020204@egenix.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1378140995.91.0.779939407113.issue12892@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On 02.09.2013 18:56, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > > Oh, I were blind. Thank you Marc-Andre. Here is corrected patch. Unfortunately it 1.4-1.5 times slower on UTF-16 encoding UCS2 strings than previous wrong patch. I think it would be faster to do this in two steps: 1. check the ranges of the input 2. do a memcpy() if there are no lone surrogates Part 1 can be further optimized by adding a simple range check (ch >= 0xd800). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-09-02 18:03:19 | lemburg | set | recipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, loewis, vstinner, ezio.melotti, tchrist, kennyluck, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-09-02 18:03:19 | lemburg | link | issue12892 messages |
| 2013-09-02 18:03:19 | lemburg | create | |