Message199194
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, kennyluck, lemburg, loewis, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, tchrist, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-10-08.11:04:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwaNzhpT0Q_6P32n9i5DWeaoBTMart33sZtDPL5pT+zLng@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <5253E0C5.3010606@egenix.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't think that performances on a microbenchmark is the good question. The good question is: does Python conform to Unicode? The answer is simple and explicit: no. Encoding lone surrogates may lead to bugs and even security vulnerabilities. Please open a new performance issue after fixing this one if you have another patch improving performances. I didn't read the patch yet, but strict, surrogatepass and surrogateescape error handlers must be checked. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-10-08 11:04:10 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, lemburg, gvanrossum, loewis, pitrou, ezio.melotti, tchrist, kennyluck, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-10-08 11:04:10 | vstinner | link | issue12892 messages |
| 2013-10-08 11:04:10 | vstinner | create | |