Message199457
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, christian.heimes, kristjan.jonsson, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-10-11.09:56:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <691672221.68628960.1381485360180.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to | <1882276521.68616056.1381485110088.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> > Reading the code, I see we now maintain a small internal buffer in > > the file object, rather than using stack allocation at the call > > sites. It is unclear to me how this saves memory, since the amount > > of memory copying should be the same. > > No, memory copying is suppressed in many cases. To clarify: the import logic uses marshal.loads(), not marshal.load(). So the aim is really to speed up unmarshalling from memory. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-10-11 09:56:07 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, barry, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, christian.heimes |
| 2013-10-11 09:56:07 | pitrou | link | issue19219 messages |
| 2013-10-11 09:56:07 | pitrou | create | |