Message200416
| Author | neologix |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, larry, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, vajrasky, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-10-19.13:20:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1382188817.0.0.601498567829.issue18747@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Well, I don't mean to be a pain, but I still think this patch shouldn't have been applied: it makes fork() not async-safe, which can trigger hard to debug, random bugs (#19227 might or might not be a direct consequence). at the very least, I still it shouldn't have been backported. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-10-19 13:20:17 | neologix | set | recipients: + neologix, barry, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, larry, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, python-dev, sbt, vajrasky |
| 2013-10-19 13:20:17 | neologix | set | messageid: <1382188817.0.0.601498567829.issue18747@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-10-19 13:20:16 | neologix | link | issue18747 messages |
| 2013-10-19 13:20:16 | neologix | create | |