Message201564
| Author | christian.heimes |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2013-10-28.18:08:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1382983701.95.0.0256937531954.issue19183@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The code in your example uses volatile. That prevents lots of compiler optimizations. In my experience compilers and CPU do a better optimization job than humans until the human factor interferes with the compiler. Even 40% might not be slower than calling memcpy() for every block or processing the input byte by byte instead of uint64 by uint64... I can't comment on ARM and Barry's ARM box is dead at the moment. Distributors or users can select different and more ARM-friendly code, too. After all the hash code is easily interchangeable. :) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-10-28 18:08:22 | christian.heimes | set | recipients: + christian.heimes, ncoghlan, pitrou, neologix, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-10-28 18:08:21 | christian.heimes | set | messageid: <1382983701.95.0.0256937531954.issue19183@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-10-28 18:08:21 | christian.heimes | link | issue19183 messages |
| 2013-10-28 18:08:21 | christian.heimes | create | |