Message203539
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Guido.van.Rossum, dirn, eric.araujo, eric.smith, gvanrossum, james, ncoghlan, peyton |
| Date | 2013-11-20.22:15:47 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1384985747.38.0.838068020753.issue19660@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't feel very strongly, but I do think that most of the things the new syntax allows are not improvements -- they make the decorator harder to read. It was intentional to force you to compute a variable before you can use it as a decorator, e.g.
spamify = (spam if p else eggs)
@spamify
def f():
pass |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-11-20 22:15:47 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, ncoghlan, eric.smith, eric.araujo, dirn, Guido.van.Rossum, james, peyton |
| 2013-11-20 22:15:47 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1384985747.38.0.838068020753.issue19660@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-11-20 22:15:47 | gvanrossum | link | issue19660 messages |
| 2013-11-20 22:15:47 | gvanrossum | create | |