Message206333
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.smith, ethan.furman, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-12-16.17:16:13 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <4420492.PjgdSlPve1@raxxla> |
| In-reply-to | <20131216161756.GA12598@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> > Did I mention __index__ is an unfortunate name for the current trend for > > this method? > Yes, but it's probably too late to change that now. Also, a fully precise > name would be something like: > > __to_int_exact_iff_object_has_integer_nature__ :) Perhaps in future (may be in 4.0) __index__ should be renamed to __int__ and __int__ to __trunc__. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-12-16 17:16:13 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, skrah, ethan.furman |
| 2013-12-16 17:16:13 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue19995 messages |
| 2013-12-16 17:16:13 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |