Message206409
| Author | ethan.furman |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, eric.smith, ethan.furman, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-12-17.07:09:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1387264199.35.0.707132858429.issue19995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thank you, Victor and Serhiy, for your pointers into the code. I'm hoping we have general agreement about %c, %o, %x, and %X and having them use __index__ only (using __int__ would open the door to float conversions). I still have a question about %i, though. The docs say %u is exactly the same as %d and is therefore deprecated. The docs do not say thay %i is the same as %d, but the descriptions are the same. Are %i and %d the same, or is there some difference? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-12-17 07:09:59 | ethan.furman | set | recipients: + ethan.furman, gvanrossum, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, Arfrever, skrah, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-12-17 07:09:59 | ethan.furman | set | messageid: <1387264199.35.0.707132858429.issue19995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-12-17 07:09:59 | ethan.furman | link | issue19995 messages |
| 2013-12-17 07:09:58 | ethan.furman | create | |