Message206885
| Author | tim.peters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, python-dev, tim.peters, vstinner, zach.ware |
| Date | 2013-12-24.03:10:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1387854607.47.0.107652282528.issue19999@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
@haypo, I've read the PEP and it has great ideas. What I'm wondering is whether they've been implemented "correctly" in the relevant cases on Windows here. That Zach see a resolution of 0.0156001 on Windows isn't plausibly a question of rounding errors: that value appears to be insane. Yes, it's vaguely close to the 0.015625 I see, but the value I see _is_ sane (being exactly 1/64) - but 0.0156001 isn't close enough to 0.015625 for "rounding errors" to be at all a plausible explanation for why it's so strange. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-12-24 03:10:07 | tim.peters | set | recipients: + tim.peters, vstinner, christian.heimes, python-dev, zach.ware |
| 2013-12-24 03:10:07 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1387854607.47.0.107652282528.issue19999@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-12-24 03:10:07 | tim.peters | link | issue19999 messages |
| 2013-12-24 03:10:06 | tim.peters | create | |