Message207114
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, eric.smith, ethan.furman, gvanrossum, larry, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date | 2013-12-30.21:51:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1388440311.04.0.50693943998.issue19995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
We don't usually *break* existing working code even if the output is wrong. If you want to make '%x' % 3.14, etc, raise an error, I think you we should go through a deprecation period first. The deprecation messages should, of course, be added now. In other words, I would probably have voted against commit even if we weren't in beta yet. It's a bit borderline, since the output is *wrong*, but given that we *are* in beta I think we'd better go the deprecation route. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-12-30 21:51:51 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, gvanrossum, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, larry, eric.smith, Arfrever, skrah, ethan.furman, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013-12-30 21:51:51 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1388440311.04.0.50693943998.issue19995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-12-30 21:51:51 | r.david.murray | link | issue19995 messages |
| 2013-12-30 21:51:49 | r.david.murray | create | |