Message209228
| Author | nikratio |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, martin.panter, nadeem.vawda, nikratio, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2014-01-25.18:46:13 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1390675573.21.0.203845624694.issue15955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Let me be more precise:
My suggestion is not to remove `unconsumed_tail` entirely, but I think its value needs to be defined only when the end of the compressed stream has been reached.
In other words, you could still do:
while not decomp.eof
# ...
if decomp.unconsumed_tail:
raise RuntimeError('unexpected data after end of compressed stream')
but as long as decomp.eof is True, decomp.unconsumed_tail could (as far as I can tell) be None, no matter if there is uncompressed data in the internal buffer or not. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-01-25 18:46:13 | nikratio | set | recipients: + nikratio, pitrou, christian.heimes, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo, Arfrever, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2014-01-25 18:46:13 | nikratio | set | messageid: <1390675573.21.0.203845624694.issue15955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-01-25 18:46:13 | nikratio | link | issue15955 messages |
| 2014-01-25 18:46:13 | nikratio | create | |