Message209729
| Author | yselivanov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, larry, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, terry.reedy, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-01-30.17:28:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1391102910.64.0.624659698032.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Attached is a second patch (sig_func_ducktype_02.patch), with a bit improved tests (and a small bug fixed). Larry, do you think it's OK if I merge this one in 3.4? Technically, it's a feature that we start to support Cython functions in inspect.signature, but from the standpoint of the API everything is the same. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-01-30 17:28:30 | yselivanov | set | recipients: + yselivanov, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, larry, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo |
| 2014-01-30 17:28:30 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1391102910.64.0.624659698032.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-01-30 17:28:30 | yselivanov | link | issue17159 messages |
| 2014-01-30 17:28:30 | yselivanov | create | |