Message209812
| Author | yselivanov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, larry, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, terry.reedy, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-01-31.19:18:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1391195927.51.0.315159473346.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Third version of the patch is attached (sig_func_ducktype_03.patch). Changes: - Toughen the tests for duck-typed function -- do not accept classes - Added comments to clarify the need of duck-typing - NEWS item - what's new item Stefan, please take a look. I want to make sure, that the fact that we won't accept classes that look like a function, is OK with you. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-01-31 19:18:47 | yselivanov | set | recipients: + yselivanov, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, larry, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo |
| 2014-01-31 19:18:47 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1391195927.51.0.315159473346.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-01-31 19:18:47 | yselivanov | link | issue17159 messages |
| 2014-01-31 19:18:46 | yselivanov | create | |