Message209972
| Author | scoder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, larry, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, terry.reedy, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-02-02.11:42:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1391341334.54.0.46898611667.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Ok, I think I figured it out now. Essentially, Cython's functions type, despite starting with the same struct layout as PyCFunction, must not visibly inherit from PyCFunction. Consequently, inspect.isbuiltin() returns False, as does inspect.isfunction() - sadly. With Yury's changes that are currently committed, this triggers the fallback that checks for the function-like signature, which in turn makes Signature.from_function() properly analyse the signature, including default arguments, annotations, etc. So, nothing left to change on CPython side for this ticket. And thanks again for the help. Closing as fixed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-02-02 11:42:14 | scoder | set | recipients: + scoder, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, larry, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, python-dev, yselivanov |
| 2014-02-02 11:42:14 | scoder | set | messageid: <1391341334.54.0.46898611667.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-02-02 11:42:14 | scoder | link | issue17159 messages |
| 2014-02-02 11:42:14 | scoder | create | |