Message210004
| Author | yselivanov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, larry, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, terry.reedy, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-02-02.17:56:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1391363783.89.0.740159702927.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Larry, > Also, I assumed that anything that had a __text_signature__ wasn't going to have any other kind of signature information. Therefore, if the object had a __text_signature__ attribute, then I already knew that's the best approach and it should definitely be first. I think that __text_signature__ is similar to the __signature__ attribute, i.e. if an object has it, then it should blindly use it, without trying anything else (where __signature__ should have a higher priority than __text_signature__) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-02-02 17:56:23 | yselivanov | set | recipients: + yselivanov, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, larry, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, python-dev |
| 2014-02-02 17:56:23 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1391363783.89.0.740159702927.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-02-02 17:56:23 | yselivanov | link | issue17159 messages |
| 2014-02-02 17:56:23 | yselivanov | create | |