Message 210099 - Python tracker

Message210099

Author	larry
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, larry, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, terry.reedy, yselivanov
Date	2014-02-03.08:45:57
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1391417157.42.0.336317136734.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> What I'm saying is that the existing function introspection API > would have provided a much better way to do these things, > and that it's good to finally have the meta data available in the > source code so that that API can be made available at some point. What "existing function introspection API"? I wasn't aware there was an existing mechanism to provide signature metadata for builtin functions.

Content

> What I'm saying is that the existing function introspection API
> would have provided a much better way to do these things,
> and that it's good to finally have the meta data available in the
> source code so that that API can be made available at some point.

What "existing function introspection API"?  I wasn't aware there was an existing mechanism to provide signature metadata for builtin functions.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-02-03 08:45:57	larry	set	recipients: + larry, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, python-dev, yselivanov
2014-02-03 08:45:57	larry	set	messageid: <1391417157.42.0.336317136734.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-03 08:45:57	larry	link	issue17159 messages
2014-02-03 08:45:57	larry	create