Message210247
| Author | steven.daprano |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gregory.p.smith, larry, ncoghlan, oscarbenjamin, steven.daprano, wolma |
| Date | 2014-02-04.16:32:05 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <20140204163200.GV3799@ando> |
| In-reply-to | <1391528594.41.0.756444288846.issue20481@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Wolfgang, Thanks for the patch, I have some concerns about it, but the basic idea does look reasonable. However, I've been convinced that supporting mixed types at all needs more careful thought. Under the circumstances, I'm more concerned about making sure we don't lock in any behaviour we'll regret, so for 3.4 I'm going to follow Nick's advice and reject mixed-type calculations. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-02-04 16:32:06 | steven.daprano | set | recipients: + steven.daprano, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, larry, oscarbenjamin, wolma |
| 2014-02-04 16:32:06 | steven.daprano | link | issue20481 messages |
| 2014-02-04 16:32:05 | steven.daprano | create | |