Message211667
| Author | yselivanov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | larry, ncoghlan, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-02-19.22:18:35 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1392848315.3.0.416585180694.issue20684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I think in 3.5 it may actually make sense to expose these as options > (perhaps with different names), so yeah, I think separate flags is > reasonable. +1 on thinking about exposing your 'follow_wrapper_chains' option in 3.5. I'll create an issue. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-02-19 22:18:35 | yselivanov | set | recipients: + yselivanov, ncoghlan, larry |
| 2014-02-19 22:18:35 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1392848315.3.0.416585180694.issue20684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-02-19 22:18:35 | yselivanov | link | issue20684 messages |
| 2014-02-19 22:18:35 | yselivanov | create | |