Message211718
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, barry, ezio.melotti, larry, michael.foord, pitrou, rbcollins, thomir |
| Date | 2014-02-20.10:54:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1392893695.41.0.237844634546.issue20687@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Antoine: would it be reasonable to rework the implementation of > subTest in a way that permitted us to revert the changes to > expectedFailure? I can't tell you for sure, but certainly not in an easy way. Expected failures were the most delicate feature to keep compatible when adding subtests. (in other words: not for 3.4, IMO) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, barry, larry, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, michael.foord, thomir |
| 2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1392893695.41.0.237844634546.issue20687@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | link | issue20687 messages |
| 2014-02-20 10:54:55 | pitrou | create | |