Message213407
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2014-03-13.15:32:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <5321CF88.2030309@free.fr> |
| In-reply-to | <1394722978.93.0.77396063038.issue20910@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> It might be possible to make the parameters dynamic, for example > using > the system loads. But I'm not really interested to invest too much time > on optimizing the timing parameters for buildbots. I would like to > ensure that tests pass with a short "test sleep" on my PC. For example, > it looks weird to check that a sleep of 500 ms takes less 1.5 seconds: > why not testing that the sleep takes less than 600 ms? Because it's too tight for some systems. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-13 15:32:27 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, vstinner, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2014-03-13 15:32:27 | pitrou | link | issue20910 messages |
| 2014-03-13 15:32:27 | pitrou | create | |