Message213766
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, nikratio, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2014-03-16.22:26:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1395008817.14.0.00442855634472.issue20951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It's probably too late to change this, unfortunately. There are non-blocking frameworks and libraries out there relying on the current behaviour. As for sendall(), it doesn't really make sense on a non-blocking socket anyway. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-16 22:26:57 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, janssen, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, r.david.murray, nikratio |
| 2014-03-16 22:26:57 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1395008817.14.0.00442855634472.issue20951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-03-16 22:26:57 | pitrou | link | issue20951 messages |
| 2014-03-16 22:26:57 | pitrou | create | |